The Montreal Screwjob of Democracy: The Ultimate Deep-Dive into the Kayfabe of the American Empire

By The Smark in the High Castle

Exclusive for LuchaKliq.com

Introduction: The Greatest Work Ever Told

If you have spent even a single hour in the sweaty, beer-soaked, adrenaline-fueled embrace of the squared circle—or if you’ve just doom-scrolled through the political timeline of the 2020s—you know the feeling. It’s that sinking realization in the pit of your stomach when the referee counts three, but the shoulder was clearly up. It’s the moment the babyface champion shakes hands with the villainous manager, revealing that the last six months of rivalry were a sham. It is the realization that you are watching a work.

In the lexicon of professional wrestling, "kayfabe" is the sacred covenant of the carny: the suspension of disbelief, the maintenance of the illusion that the staged combat in the ring is a legitimate athletic contest. It is a collaborative fiction. The performers know it’s fake; the promoters know it’s fake; and deep down, the "smart marks"—or smarks—know it’s fake too. But we buy the ticket because we want to believe in the drama. We want to believe that Good can triumph over Evil, that the rules matter, and that the referee is blind but impartial.

American politics is the ultimate wrestling promotion. It is a multi-trillion-dollar territory where the "Creative Control" team—an interlocking directorate of corporate oligarchs, defense contractors, and tech titans—books the matches, writes the promos, and predetermines the winners long before the first vote is cast. For decades, the booking was subtle. They kept the kayfabe alive. They maintained the illusion of a "liberal democracy" where the government served the people, where the press was a watchdog, and where the military existed solely for defense.

But something broke. The booking got lazy. The heels got too arrogant. And now, in the chaotic landscape of the mid-2020s, specifically under the second coming of Donald Trump, the kayfabe has been shattered. We are witnessing the greatest "shoot" (a legitimate, unscripted fight) in the history of governance. The masks are off. The "powers that be" are no longer pretending to play by the rules of the constitutional republic. They are turning the United States government into a private holding company, merging the state with the corporation in a move that makes the nWo’s hostile takeover look like a backyard wrestling skirmish.

To truly understand this "Montreal Screwjob" of the American populace, we cannot just look at the dirt sheets of today. We have to go back to the archives. We have to study the tape library of the "Old Gods"—the legendary workers who ran the territory in the 1960s. We have to analyze the farewell promos of Dwight D. Eisenhower and John F. Kennedy. These weren’t just speeches; they were warnings from the locker room veterans. They told us the "turn" was coming. They told us about the "Military-Industrial Complex" and the "Scientific-Technological Elite." They warned us about "Secret Societies" and the dangers of a monolithic conspiracy.

For years, the marks treated these speeches as patriotic nostalgia. But when we overlay those 1961 warnings onto the 2025 reality of the "Department of War," the "Department of Government Efficiency" (DOGE), and the rise of "Technological Feudalism," the picture becomes terrifyingly clear. Eisenhower and JFK weren't predicting the future; they were spoiling the finish.

This is not a blog post. This is the manifesto. This is the exhaustive, no-holds-barred, deep-dive comparison of the warnings of the past against the "shoot" actions of the present. We will trace the bloodline of the American Oligarchy from the Cold War to the Meme War. We will expose the mechanics of the corporate takeover, the biopolitical heel turn of the health state, and the dystopian "booking sheet" for 2030.

Grab your popcorn and your tinfoil hats, LuchaKliq. We’re about to break the business wide open.

Part I: The Old Gods Speak – Deconstructing the 1961 Promos

Before we can dissect the current angle involving Trump, Musk, and the neoliberal heel faction, we must perform a forensic analysis of the source material. Eisenhower and Kennedy are the Bruno Sammartinos of this story—the pillars of the territory who saw the corruption seeping in and tried to cut one last promo to smarten up the crowd.

The General’s Farewell: Ike on the Military-Industrial Complex and the Tech Elite

Dwight D. Eisenhower’s farewell address on January 17, 1961, stands as perhaps the most significant "shoot interview" in presidential history.¹ Eisenhower was a five-star general, a man who had lived the gimmick of the military hero his entire life. He led the Allied Forces in World War II. He was the ultimate "babyface" of the American Century. For him to turn around on his way out the door and bury the very industry that made him—the military establishment—was a moment of supreme irony and clarity.

The Military-Industrial Complex (MIC)

Eisenhower’s most famous line is his warning against the "unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex".² He noted that the "conjunction of an immense military establishment and a large arms industry is new in the American experience".⁴

In wrestling terms, Ike was warning that the "security" (the military) and the "merch table" (the arms industry) were merging to control the outcome of the matches. He saw that if the profit motive (selling weapons) became the driving force of defense policy, the "booking" would always lead to war because war moves units. The "American makers of plowshares" had become makers of swords, and they couldn't afford to stop making them.²

But Ike went deeper. He warned that the "total influence—economic, political, even spiritual—is felt in every city, every State house, every office of the Federal government".³ This was the first acknowledgement of the Deep State—not as a shadowy cabal of lizard people, but as a structural reality of economic incentives. He warned that "we must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes".⁴

The Scientific-Technological Elite: The Buried Lede

While everyone remembers the MIC line, the "smarks" know that the second part of Eisenhower’s promo is the one that truly predicts the 2025 hellscape. Ike warned about the "Scientific-Technological Elite".⁴

He described a revolution where research becomes "central, formalized, complex, and costly," and largely conducted at the direction of the Federal government.⁴ He explicitly stated:

"The prospect of domination of the nation's scholars by Federal employment, project allocations, and the power of money is ever present... Yet, in holding scientific research and discovery in respect, as we should, we must also be alert to the equal and opposite danger that public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific-technological elite." ²

This is the critical "buried lede." Ike wasn't just worried about generals and tank manufacturers; he was worried about the technocrats. He foresaw a world where the complexity of governance and warfare became so high—where the "algorithms" of the 1960s (computers, nuclear physics) became so opaque—that the average citizen (the mark) could no longer understand the rules of the match. Power would shift from the elected representatives (the faces) to the guys in the back with the headsets and the clipboards (the elite).

In 2025, this warning has manifested as the "Tech-Industrial Complex." The "Scientific-Technological Elite" are no longer faceless government scientists in lab coats working at Los Alamos; they are the celebrity CEOs of Silicon Valley. They are Elon Musk, Peter Thiel, and the "PayPal Mafia" who have transitioned from disrupting taxi services to disrupting the Westphalian nation-state. As we will see later with the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) and the algorithmic warfare of Project Nimbus, the "capture" of public policy by this elite is now complete. The scientists didn't just capture the policy; they bought the federation, fired the bookers, and put themselves in the main event.

The Playboy’s Warning: JFK and the "Monolithic Conspiracy"

If Ike was the stern veteran warning about the mechanics of the business, John F. Kennedy was the charismatic high-flyer cutting a promo about the "dark forces" invading the territory. His speech before the American Newspaper Publishers Association on April 27, 1961, is infamous in conspiracy circles for its references to "secret societies".⁶

The "Secret Societies" Soundbite vs. Context

Conspiracy theorists (the "fantasy bookers" of the political world) love to clip this speech out of context to claim JFK was exposing the Illuminati, the Freemasons, or the Globalists. "The very word 'secrecy' is repugnant in a free and open society," Kennedy said.⁸ He spoke of being opposed by a "monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies primarily on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence—on infiltration instead of invasion, on subversion instead of elections".⁷

However, to truly understand the "work," we must look at the context. This speech was delivered just ten days after the Bay of Pigs disaster.⁸ JFK wasn't talking about the Illuminati; he was "shooting" on Communism and the Soviet Union. His argument was essentially: The other team (the Soviets) is fighting a no-disqualification match. They don't follow the rules. They use secrecy. We are an open society (faces), and that puts us at a disadvantage.

Crucially, in a twist that many modern commentators miss, JFK was actually asking the press for self-censorship.⁶ He was asking them to "booking committee" the news—to withhold information that could help the enemy. "Every newspaper now asks itself... 'Is it news?' All I suggest is that you add the question: 'Is it in the interest of the national security?'".⁹ He was asking the "dirt sheets" (the press) to stop exposing the business (state secrets) because it was hurting the promotion (the USA) in its war against the rival promotion (the USSR).

The Modern Twist: The Inversion of Secrecy

The irony—the "swerve"—is how this warning has aged. JFK warned that we faced a monolithic conspiracy that used infiltration and subversion. Today, the Corporate Oligarchy operates exactly like the "monolithic conspiracy" JFK described, but it does so from within the US power structure.

Infiltration: Corporate lobbyists writing legislation (ALEC, Project 2025).
Subversion: Undermining regulatory agencies from the inside (DOGE).
Intimidation: Using economic power to silence dissent (de-banking, algorithmic suppression).

Furthermore, the "secrecy" JFK loathed has become the default operating mode of the Corporate State. As we will explore in the sections on Trump's second term, the government is moving to hide its internal workings—evading FOIA for DOGE, using encrypted messaging apps for official business, and barring the press from the White House—while simultaneously demanding total transparency from the citizens through Surveillance Capitalism. The state has adopted the tactics of the "ruthless conspiracy" to maintain its heat. The "open society" JFK defended is now a "panopticon society" owned by the very elites Eisenhower warned us about.

Part II: The 2025 Angle – The Return of the Golden Don and the New Stable

Fast forward to 2025. The political landscape has shifted seismically. The "Kayfabe" of liberal democracy—the idea that the government exists to serve the people—is being shattered. We are witnessing the formation of a new super-stable, a faction of oligarchs, tech bros, and authoritarian nationalists who have decided to run the territory their way.

Donald Trump’s second term (2025-2029) is not just a rerun of his first; it’s the "Attitude Era" reboot. The gloves are off. The "adults in the room" (the old establishment handlers like John Kelly or Rex Tillerson) have been fired, and the "booking" is now being handled by the wildest minds in the business.

The First Run (2017-2021): The Soft Launch

To understand the brutality of the 2025 "shoot," we must briefly recap the "soft launch" of the first term. In wrestling terms, Trump's first term was a "worked shoot." He talked like he was breaking the rules—attacking the media, praising dictators, railing against the Deep State—but the actual mechanics of governance remained largely within the established neoliberal framework.

Tax Cuts: The 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act was standard Republican booking—giving the "money marks" (corporations) a massive payout.
Deregulation: He cut regulations, but through the slow, bureaucratic process of the Administrative Procedure Act.
Personnel: He was surrounded by "establishment" figures who acted as "road agents," keeping him from going completely off-script.

The oligarchs were happy with the tax cuts, but they were frustrated by the chaos and the lack of structural change. They realized that to truly take over the territory, they needed a more disciplined, more radical approach. They needed a plan. Enter Project 2025.

The Second Run (2025-Present): The Hard Shoot

The 2024 election was the "main event" that set up the new storyline. Trump returned not just with a mandate, but with a manifesto. Project 2025, orchestrated by the Heritage Foundation and staffed by Trump loyalists, provided the "booking sheet" for the complete dismantling of the administrative state.¹⁰

This term is different. This term is characterized by Executive Absolutism and the Merger of State and Corporation.

The "Cabinet of Billionaires": The New Four Horsemen

The narrative that Trump is a "populist" fighting for the "forgotten man" is the greatest piece of kayfabe since Hulk Hogan was the "third man" of the nWo. The reality is evident in the personnel. Trump’s 2025 administration is a merger of the State and the Oligarchy.¹¹

The Tech Oligarchy: Figures like Elon Musk and Peter Thiel are not just donors; they are architects. They represent the "Technological Feudalism" faction. They want to dismantle the regulatory state because it interferes with their "sovereignty."
The Corporate Raiders: The administration is staffed with asset strippers and deregulation zealots who view the federal government as a distressed asset to be liquidated.¹³
The Net Worth: Trump’s cabinet is the richest in US history, with a collective net worth of over $460 billion.¹² This isn't a government of the people; it's a board of directors meeting.

This isn't a government; it's a hostile takeover. The "Deep State" that Trump railed against is being replaced by a "Deep Corporate State." The warning Ike gave about the "councils of government" acquiring "unwarranted influence" has been realized, but the influence isn't unsought—it was invited in through the front door.

Part III: DOGE – The Corporate Screwjob

If there is one storyline that epitomizes the "Scientific-Technological Elite" taking over public policy, it is the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE).¹⁴ This is the angle that keeps the smart marks up at night.

The Gimmick: "Efficiency" and "Memes"

On the surface, DOGE is presented with a babyface gimmick wrapped in internet humor. Named after the cryptocurrency and the meme, it appeals to the common frustration with bureaucracy. "We’re here to cut waste! We’re here to save the taxpayers money!".¹⁶ It’s a populist hook. Who doesn't hate the DMV? Who doesn't want "efficiency"?

But in wrestling, the heel often thinks he’s the good guy. The reality of DOGE is a "shoot" attack on the mechanisms of accountability and the civil service.

The Shoot: Dismantling the Referees

Elon Musk, the "Technoking" turned "Secretary of Efficiency" (though legally a "special government employee" to dodge conflicts of interest), is using DOGE to execute a purge.¹⁴ The structure of this department reveals the true intent:

1. The Transparency Blackout (The "Dark Match")

The most alarming aspect of DOGE is its opacity.

The Structure: DOGE was strategically placed within the Executive Office of the President (EOP) rather than as an independent agency. Why? Because the administration argues that EOP records are "presidential records" and thus exempt from the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) until at least 2034.¹⁷
The Comms: DOGE staff were ordered to stop using Slack and move to ephemeral messaging apps like Signal, or internal systems not subject to archiving, effectively "burning the tapes" so no one can watch the match back.¹⁷
The Lawsuits: Watchdog groups like Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) and American Oversight have had to sue just to find out who is working there and what they are doing.¹⁷ This is the exact "secrecy" JFK warned about—"repugnant in a free and open society." The government is operating in the dark while demanding the citizens live in the light.

2. Schedule F: The Firing Squad

The mechanism for the purge is "Schedule F" (rebranded in 2025 as "Schedule Policy/Career").¹⁹

The Order: Executive Order 14222 and related directives allow the reclassification of tens of thousands of career civil servants as "political appointees."
The Impact: This strips them of civil service protections, meaning they can be fired at will for "disloyalty."
The Analysis: This isn't about "draining the swamp"; it's about removing the referees. Civil servants—scientists at the EPA, lawyers at the DOJ, analysts at the SEC—operate on statutes and regulations. They are the "rules of the match." By replacing them with loyalists, the administration ensures that the outcome of every regulatory decision is predetermined. It’s the ultimate "fix." If a scientist says a chemical is dangerous, they get fired and replaced by a "yes man" from the industry. Ike’s fear of public policy becoming the "captive" of an elite is now codified law.

3. The Firing of the IGs: The Friday Night Massacre

In a move that screams "hostile takeover," the administration fired 17 Inspectors General in one night in January 2025.¹⁵

The Role of IGs: Inspectors General are the internal auditors of the government. They investigate fraud, waste, and abuse.
The Corporate Analogy: In a public corporation, if the CEO fires the internal auditors in the middle of the night, the stock crashes and the SEC investigates. In the US government of 2025, it means the looting is about to begin. The "watchdogs" have been put down.

The Oligarch’s Angle: Conflict of Interest as Business Model

Musk’s involvement is the most blatant "work" of all. His companies (Tesla, SpaceX, Neuralink, xAI) receive billions in federal contracts and are subject to billions in potential fines from regulators (NHTSA, SEC, FAA, NLRB).¹²

The Conflict: By running DOGE, Musk is essentially the player-coach-referee. He has the power to "defund" the agencies investigating his rockets for environmental damage or his cars for safety violations.
The Result: He can "streamline" the procurement process to favor his satellites for the Department of War (Starlink). This isn't just the "military-industrial complex"; it's the "Digital-Military-Industrial Complex".²² It is the privatization of the state’s regulatory power for personal gain.

Part IV: War Games – The Department of War and the New Imperialism

If DOGE is the bureaucratic heel turn, the rebranding of the Department of Defense is the violent hardcore match that signals a shift in the nation's psychology.

The Rebrand: "Department of War"

On September 5, 2025, Trump signed Executive Order 14347, "Restoring the United States Department of War".²³

The Kayfabe Explanation

The administration’s press release claims this return to the pre-1947 name is about "historical accuracy" and projecting "strength" and "resolve".²⁴ It’s a nostalgia pop, harkening back to the days of WWII when the US "won wars." They argue that "Defense" implies a passive, reactive posture, while "War" implies the willingness to fight and win.

The Shoot Meaning

Words matter. In the semiotics of statecraft, this is a massive shift.

Aggression: "War" implies aggression, conquest, and offense. It signals to the international community that the US is no longer the "policeman of the world" (a face role, however flawed) but a "Warlord" (a heel role). It normalizes the state of perpetual conflict.
Psychology: It prepares the domestic population for offensive operations. It is "New MAGA Imperialism".²⁵
The Cost: The rebrand alone is estimated to cost $2 billion for new signage, letterhead, branding, and digital assets.²³ For an administration obsessed with "DOGE efficiency" and cutting "waste," spending $2 billion on a logo change is a glaring contradiction—unless the symbolism is worth more than the money. It’s a branding exercise, like changing the WWF to the WWE, but with nuclear weapons.

The Military-Tech Merger: Project Nimbus and Beyond

Eisenhower’s MIC has evolved. It’s no longer just the "iron triangle" of Congress, the Pentagon, and traditional defense contractors like Lockheed Martin and Raytheon. The new players are the Big Tech giants: Google, Amazon, Microsoft, and Palantir.

Project 2025 Implementation: The administration is pushing for "speed and scale" in defense acquisition, explicitly favoring "commercial solutions" via Executive Orders signed in April 2025.²⁶ This is code for funneling money to the Tech Oligarchs rather than the traditional legacy primes.
The Digital Battlefield: The focus is on AI, autonomous drones, and space superiority.
- Space Force & Starlink: Executive Order 14369 "Ensuring American Space Superiority" ²⁸ aligns directly with Musk’s SpaceX interests.
- AI Warfare: The "Genesis Mission" (EO 14363) ²⁸ and the integration of AI into kill chains (Project Nimbus) ²² represent the automation of violence.
The Conflict: As detailed in the "Big Tech and the US Digital-Military-Industrial Complex" analysis ²², these companies now control the "dual-use" technologies essential for modern war. They are "quasi-sovereign."
- The Musk Precedent: When Elon Musk can decide whether or not to turn on Starlink for a specific theater of war (as seen in Ukraine), he has usurped the role of the Commander-in-Chief. The "Department of War" might technically be run by the government, but the infrastructure of war is owned by the oligarchs. This is the Technological Feudalism where the "Lords" (Tech CEOs) provide the "Knights" (Drones/AI) to the King (President) in exchange for land and tax exemptions.

The Withdrawal: America Alone

Executive Order 14199, signed in February 2025, initiated the withdrawal of the US from 66 international organizations.²⁹

The List: The US pulled out of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the International Solar Alliance, UNESCO (again), and dozens of UN bodies related to human rights, migration, and development.
The Logic: This is the "America First" isolationist heel turn. It rejects the "liberal international order" built by the US after WWII.
The Impact: By exiting the table, the US creates a power vacuum that allows the Oligarchs to negotiate directly with foreign states, bypassing international law. It also signals a complete abandonment of global cooperation on climate change, which the administration views as a "hoax" or an impediment to profit.

Part V: The Information Stranglehold – Killing the Dirt Sheets

In wrestling, the "dirt sheets" (insider newsletters like the Wrestling Observer) are hated by promoters because they expose the business. They tell the fans who is injured, who is winning the title, and who is fighting in the locker room. In politics, this role is played by the free press.

JFK asked the press for "self-discipline" during the Cold War.⁶ Trump’s 2025 administration is demanding submission.

The Lockout: Revoking Credentials

The administration has launched a systematic war on access.

The White House Ban: In October 2025, the administration restricted access to the Press Secretary’s office and the "Upper Press" area, citing "security".³¹ Journalists can no longer walk the halls; they need appointments. This kills the "scrum" and the ability to ask unscreened questions.
The AP Ban: The most petty and "kayfabe" move was the barring of the Associated Press (AP) from the Oval Office and Air Force One. Why? Because the AP refused to use the administration's new name for the Gulf of Mexico: the "Gulf of America".³³
- Analysis: This is Vince McMahon-level booking. "Call the belt by its proper name or you don't get a title shot." It forces the media to participate in the administration's alternate reality or be exiled. It is a loyalty test.
The Pentagon Purge: Journalists were forced to vacate offices in the Pentagon unless they signed agreements that could brand them "security risks" for asking questions.³¹ This effectively blinds the public to the actions of the newly christened Department of War.

The War on "Disinformation" (The Censorship Shoot)

Executive Order 14149, "Restoring Freedom of Speech and Ending Federal Censorship" ³⁵, sounds like a face promo. "We’re restoring free speech!" But in practice, it bars federal agencies from coordinating with social media platforms to flag disinformation.

The Effect: This dismantles the "guardrails" against foreign propaganda and domestic disinformation campaigns.
The Gamification: This aligns with the "Gamification of Politics".³⁷ By removing the referees of truth, the administration allows the "heels" (bots, trolls, state actors) to flood the zone with noise (the "firehose of falsehood"). It creates a reality where the narrative matters more than the facts. Politics becomes a game of engagement farming, and the administration—led by the King of Twitter—knows how to play that game better than anyone.

This connects directly back to JFK’s "secret societies." The administration is creating a "secret society" within the government (shielded from the press and FOIA) while simultaneously unleashing a chaotic flood of misinformation on the public to keep them confused.

Part VI: The Exit Strategy – Network States and Corporate Sovereignty

Here is where the "Future Projections" get truly dark. The Oligarchs know the American territory is burning out. The "heat" is too high, the debt is too massive, and the infrastructure is crumbling. So, like a top star whose contract is expiring, they are looking to leave the territory and start their own promotion.

The Rise of the "Network State"

The concept, popularized by Balaji Srinivasan (a key figure in the tech-right stable), is that digital communities should crowdsource territory and gain diplomatic recognition as sovereign states.³⁹ This is the exit strategy for the "Scientific-Technological Elite."

1. Praxis: The Spaceport City

Praxis, backed by Peter Thiel and the Winklevoss twins, is a "defense-focused spaceport city" project.⁴⁰

The Pitch: A new city built on the Mediterranean or in Greenland, governed by "techno-optimism."
The Reality: A breakaway civilization for the ultra-wealthy, protected by private military contractors and exempt from the laws of "legacy states."

2. Próspera: The Crypto-Colony

Próspera is a "charter city" in Honduras where corporations write their own laws, levy their own taxes, and run their own arbitration courts.⁴²

The Conflict: When the Honduran government tried to revoke its special status, Próspera sued them for $11 billion. This is Corporate Sovereignty in action: a corporation suing a nation-state for the right to rule its own territory.
The Precedent: This creates a model where sovereignty is purchasable.

3. Trump’s "Freedom Cities"

Domestically, Trump’s "Freedom Cities" initiative and the push for "Special Innovation Districts" ⁴¹ are the American version of this.

The Concept: Federal land turned over to private developers to build "futuristic" cities.
The Implication: These will likely be "Corporate Sovereignty Zones" where federal/state labor laws, environmental regulations, and taxes are suspended in favor of corporate bylaws. It is the revival of the "Company Town" on a sci-fi scale.

The "Sovereignty" Swerve

This is the ultimate realization of the "Corporate Takeover." The goal isn't just to buy the government; it's to replace the government.

The Logic: "Why pay taxes to Washington when we can pay subscription fees to Praxis?"
The Danger: It creates a two-tier world. The "Scientific-Technological Elite" (and those who can afford their ticket) live in high-tech, deregulated, guarded enclaves (the "Network States"). The rest of us—the "jobbers"—are left in the "Legacy State," dealing with the crumbling roads, the hyper-policing, and the Department of War drafts.

This is the "Technological Feudalism" that economist Yanis Varoufakis warned about.⁴⁴ We are no longer citizens; we are "serfs" on the digital land owned by Cloud Capitalists. We work on their platforms (Amazon, Uber, TikTok), we pay them rent (cloud fees, subscriptions), and we have no democratic recourse because they exist above the state.

Part VII: Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) – The Biopolitical Work

We cannot ignore the "Make America Healthy Again" (MAHA) angle featuring RFK Jr., the "black sheep" of the Kennedy dynasty turned Trump ally.⁴⁶

The Face Promo: "Fighting Chronic Disease"

The MAHA Commission aims to tackle the "chronic disease epidemic" in children. It correctly identifies Ultra-Processed Foods (UPFs) and environmental toxins as major heels.⁴⁸ This is the "face turn" of the angle—addressing a real, visceral problem that affects millions of families. Who can argue against healthy kids?

The Heel Reality: Data Mining and Biopolitics

However, the solutions proposed reveal the deeper agenda of the Surveillance State.

Genetic Mapping: The report recommends a "national initiative to map gene-environment interactions".⁴⁶ In the hands of a government run by data-hungry tech oligarchs, this is a privacy nightmare.
Surveillance: The report calls for improved "vaccine safety surveillance" and data collection.
The Convergence: In the context of Surveillance Capitalism, this data is gold. It feeds the insurance algorithms, the employment screenings, and the "bio-surveillance" apparatus.
The Warning: Ike warned of public policy being captive to a scientific elite. MAHA risks making our biology captive to that elite. If the government (and its corporate partners) defines "health," and holds the genetic map of the population, they can define who is "fit" to serve, to work, and to reproduce. It is the bio-political component of the new feudalism. The "body" of the citizen becomes just another data point to be optimized or discarded.

Part VIII: Future Projections – The 2030 Booking Sheet

Based on the trajectory of 2025-2026, the executive orders, and the rise of the Oligarchs, here is the "fantasy booking" for the next five years. It’s not a feel-good story.

1. The "Ghost Board" and Dark Governance

By 2026-2027, we are seeing predictions of "Ghost Boards".⁴³

The Trend: Following the backlash against ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) and the rise of "national security" excuses, major corporations will petition to keep their director bios private.
The Mechanism: Investors will vote for directors identified only by serial numbers or "alpha-generating achievements."
The Result: Total anonymity for the ruling class. The "Secret Societies" JFK mentioned will be the boards of the S&P 500, operating in total darkness, immune to public pressure or boycotts.

2. The Gamification of Politics and "Mindwars"

Politics will cease to be about policy and will become purely about Gamification.³⁷

The Tools: AI-generated content, deepfakes, and "predictive programming" will turn elections into "Reality TV" seasons.
The Goal: To increase "engagement" rather than civic participation. The "Mindwars" ⁵⁰ will be fought not for territory, but for attention span. The citizenry will be kept in a state of constant dopamine-loop agitation, fighting over "kayfabe" culture war issues while the oligarchs loot the treasury.

3. The Fragmentation of the US (The Territory Split)

The tension between the "Red State" laws (anti-woke, deregulated) and "Blue State" resistance, combined with the rise of "Network States," will fracture the US.

Corporate Sovereignty Zones: We will see states like Texas or Nevada allowing corporations to effectively govern districts.
The "Legacy State" Collapse: The federal government, stripped of its civil service and funding (via DOGE), will fail to provide basic services. The wealthy will retreat to private cities (Praxis/Freedom Cities), while the poor are left in "sacrifice zones."

4. The Final Deletion of the Civil Service

The "Schedule F" purge will be completed. The federal workforce will be reduced by 50-75%.⁵¹ The remaining functions will be automated via AI (run by Musk/Thiel companies) or outsourced to contractors. The "State" as a public entity will effectively cease to exist; it will be a logo slapped on a web of private contracts.

Conclusion: The Bell Rings

Dwight Eisenhower and John F. Kennedy were the "old school" promoters. They understood the business. They tried to warn the locker room that the money marks and the technicians were coming to take over the territory.

Ike said: Watch out for the merger of the military and the industry, and watch out for the technocrats.
JFK said: Watch out for secret oaths and monolithic conspiracies.

In 2025, the warnings have come true, but with a twist they couldn't have booked. The Military-Industrial Complex became the Digital-Military Complex. The Secret Societies became Private Equity Boards and Dark MAGA chat rooms. The Monolithic Conspiracy became Surveillance Capitalism.

Trump, Musk, and the New Oligarchy have "shot" on the American system. They have broken the kayfabe of democracy. They aren't pretending to serve the public interest anymore; they are openly building a system of Oligarchic Sovereignty and Technological Feudalism.

We, the people, are now the jobbers in this match. We are meant to take the bumps, buy the merch, and cheer for the finish. But unlike a wrestling match, we can't just change the channel. The cage is locked, the referee is fired, and the heel has a steel chair.

The only question left is: Are we going to mark out, or are we going to smarten up?

Data Comparison: The "Booking" of The State

Feature	1961 Warning (Ike/JFK)	2025 Reality (Trump/Musk)	Wrestling Analogy
The Power Structure	"Military-Industrial Complex" (Ike)	"Digital-Military-Industrial Complex" (Big Tech + DOD)	The stable expands; the nWo merges with The Authority.
The Technocrats	"Scientific-Technological Elite" (Ike)	DOGE (Musk/Ramaswamy) & The PayPal Mafia	The IT guys are now booking the main event.
Secrecy	"Secret Societies" & "Covert Means" (JFK)	FOIA Evasion, Signal usage, "Ghost Boards"	The match is pre-taped in an empty arena; no witnesses.
The Military	"Permanent Armaments Industry" (Ike)	"Department of War" Rebrand & Project Nimbus	The "Defense" gimmick is dropped for the "War" gimmick.
The Press	"Self-Discipline" requested (JFK)	Credentials Revoked, Censorship EOs, AP Ban	The dirt sheets are banned from the building.
The Endgame	"Plundering resources of tomorrow" (Ike)	"Network States" & "Corporate Sovereignty"	The top stars leave the territory to start their own league.

Deep Dive Analysis: The Three Pillars of the Takeover

To conclude this report, we must synthesize the three main pillars of this transformation. These are the "second-order insights" that explain why this is happening now.

1. The "Scientific-Technological Elite" Prophecy Fulfilled

When Eisenhower warned that "public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific-technological elite," he was likely imagining nuclear physicists and rocket scientists influencing the President.⁴ He could not have foreseen Elon Musk—a private citizen with security clearance, billions in government contracts, and control over the global satellite communications network (Starlink)—literally sitting in the White House slashing the federal budget via DOGE.¹¹

Insight: The "Elite" didn't just capture the policy; they privatized the policy-making apparatus. By using AI and algorithms to determine "efficiency" (as DOGE proposes), they remove the human/democratic element from governance. The algorithm becomes the law, and the algorithm is proprietary.

2. The Inversion of JFK’s "Secrecy"

JFK’s speech is often cited as a call against secrecy, but as the research shows, it was a call for press restraint in the face of a secret enemy.⁶

Insight: The Trump 2025 administration has weaponized this ambiguity. They use the rhetoric of "transparency" (attacking the "Deep State") to justify the creation of a more opaque system (DOGE hidden in EOP, use of ephemeral messaging).¹⁷ They claim to be fighting "Censorship" (EO 14149) while actively stripping the press of access.³¹ It is a "kayfabe" transparency that cloaks a "shoot" authoritarianism.

3. The Rise of "Technological Feudalism"

The move toward "Network States" and "Charter Cities" (Próspera, Praxis) represents a fundamental break from the Westphalian state model.³⁹ This isn't just rich people buying islands; it's the re-territorialization of capital.

Insight: Capital used to fly over borders (globalization). Now, Capital wants to become the border (sovereignty). If corporations achieve sovereignty, human rights become "terms of service." You don't have rights; you have a "user agreement." If you violate the agreement (dissent), you are "de-platformed" from your home. This aligns with the "Technological Feudalism" theory ⁴⁴—the end of capitalism as a market system and the beginning of a rentier system owned by the Cloud Lords.

The "Department of War" rebrand ²³ aligns with the "America First" imperialist doctrine ²⁵—using military power not to "police the world" for democracy, but to seize resources and enforce economic terms. It is the "Might makes Right" era.

Final Word from the Editor:

The "American Dream" was a great gimmick. It drew a lot of money. But the booking has changed. The new storyline is "Corporate Feudalism," and spoiler alert: the marks don't go over in the end.

Report compiled by LuchaKliq Analytics Division, January 11, 2026.

Source Citations:

Sunday, January 11, 2026